|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
By: MichaelHatton,
 in Electronics
,
Sep 21, 2002
Pros: Quality Pictures; Video Recording; Build Quality; Compact; Extras
Cons: Auto Focus problems; Shutter Speed in Auto mode.
Bottom Line: A camera that is small enough and quick enough to use, with all the features a bigger cam would have.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: babka,
Jan 7, 2003
Pros: Colour quality, 640x480 video, small size, docking cradle
Cons: the usual small-camera cons: some red eye, just ok flash, smaller battery
Bottom Line: A very compact, flexible camera with auto and manual controls, excellent colour, VGA video, plenty of resolution and handy docking cradle.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: excise,
Mar 8, 2003
Pros: Sturdy Housing, Very Versatile, Uses SmartMedia cards, Great Value!
Cons: Menus are small.
Bottom Line: This camera does everything, is very compact, well-made and a joy to use!
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: Ames100,
Oct 17, 2002
Pros: Small size, light weight, great photos, great video
Cons: Video out on docking station, lack of PAL, fast charger costs extra
Bottom Line: I bought it after careful evaluation. It's not perfect, but it is a superb piece of engineering, and best of the lot currently available for my purposes.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: bwhn,
Dec 30, 2003
Pros: Picture Quality, Ease of Use, Solid Build Quality
Cons: Battery life could be better, USB2.0 would be nice
Bottom Line: Easy enough to operate for beginners, yet high enough quality to satisfy an avid photographer.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
By: Russhoolio,
Jul 4, 2002
Pros: Great exposure control and contrast, good manual controls
Cons: no more NP-80 battery, docking cradle costs extra
Bottom Line: best bang for your falling buck.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: sandtang,
Apr 22, 2003
Pros: Good Pix, Video with Audio, Output to TV, Web-cam, File copy
Cons: 5-hr recharge time, microphone pick-up not sensitive enough, no pouch
Bottom Line: No exageration. Does everything it's supposed to do.
Buy it, if like me, you want a combination of above average stills and video capabilities in a small package.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: azuretower,
Aug 31, 2003
Pros: Solid,good quality images,fast recycle,easy to use,good range of exposure modes.
Cons: Vertical format shape and 8 way selector take getting used to.
Bottom Line: Compact,rugged and delivers quality pictures easily and with no fuss.Spare 64MB Smart Media cards cheaply available.Battery life very good for a digicam.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: fair_is_fair,
Jun 14, 2003
Pros: Good pictures!
Cons: Some red eye
Bottom Line: Its a point and shoot camera with better than average results.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
|
By: lasaint888,
Jul 9, 2002
Pros: Great all-aluminum construction, compact size, fantastic image quality and great body design.
Cons: $599 MSRP.
Bottom Line: An under-rated digital camera. Looking for a digicam? Take a look at the Fuji, you will be surprised and amazed!
|
|
