|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: three_ster,
Sep 15, 2004
Pros: size, ease of use, light-weight, and it just plain looks cool
Cons: can be looked at as being expensive for a camera
Bottom Line: The Coolpix 5200 is a great digital camera. It is easy enough to use for beginners, and does just enough cool stuff for enthusiasts to love it as well.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: johntclever,
Jul 30, 2004
Pros: Utra-compact, ultra-powerful!
Cons: Wish Nikon would have included the AC adapter.
Bottom Line: If you are looking for a great point-and-shoot camera that you can take anywhere, this is it!
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: chince,
Jan 18, 2005
Pros: Picture quality, design, metal body, and it's a Nikon!
Cons: None really.
Bottom Line: This is a lot of camera for the money. It takes a great picture and built so well it should last as long as you want it to.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: buzzter_brown,
Mar 25, 2006
Pros: Small, ergonomic, easy navigation, sharp, SD card, metal case, fast ON, fast pictures, full video.
Cons: Plastic buttons and battery cover, lousy video sound, no manual controls.
Bottom Line: I would buy two.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: paulsperry,
Jul 3, 2004
Pros: Excellent images, accurate focusing, quick on/off, small, excellent feel and quality, quiet zoom, SD card
Cons: Some settings are deep within menus, no control over/display of shutter speed/f-stop
Bottom Line: This camera takes excellent digital images while being small and well designed. I find it useful enough to carry continuously, yet good enough to rely upon as my primary camera.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: ksouma,
Oct 4, 2004
Pros: Image quality, size, speed, features
Cons: Included memory
Bottom Line: This is a great camera! This camera stands out of the crowd with it's above average image quality!
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: chamaur,
Feb 2, 2006
Pros: Small lightwieght and nice priced.
Cons: None yet.
Bottom Line: Good price good quality
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: themansnoop,
Mar 2, 2006
Pros: All round fantastic with cheap price.
Cons: nothing really, tho no sepia mode.
Bottom Line: Great camera with tiny price for what its worth. Cant go wrong for ease of use, but with proffesionality of a serious jobby.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: lorika,
Feb 20, 2005
Pros: Intuitive controls (buttons themselves)
Great quality pictures
Cons: Some menus are not intuitive
Bottom Line: I highly recommend this camera for beginners who wish to learn more or advanced users that prefer compactness.
|
|
|
Author's Rating:
|
|
| Ease of Use: |
|
| Durability: |
|
| Photo Quality: |
|
| Battery Life: |
|
| Shutter Lag |
|
|
By: fotographer19,
Jan 12, 2005
Pros: Picture quality, size, flash, and ease of use.
Cons: None really except for battery life is about average for digital.
|
|
